Update on Upzoning

San Francisco Planning has nearly completed its years-long project to meet the quota of 82,000 new housing units imposed on us by the State.  (For more information read this primer from SF Planning.)  The City’s response is to upzone nearly two-thirds of the City’s residential lots – from Glen Park/Noe Valley to the northeast/northside and all the areas west of Twin Peaks.  (See this interactive map with the Lurie Administration’s “Family Zoning Plan” proposed heights.)  This blanket upzoning plan includes “waivers” of key planning code requirements – such as current rear yard setbacks and added height bonuses for some blocks and for corner and large properties. 

How does this affect Dolores Heights?  The table on the DHIC website summarizes the key changes that can be incorporated into new housing projects in our neighborhood. Say hello to 65 foot buildings on corners and to adjacent buildings that extend 20 feet past your home’s rear wall.  

DHIC opposes this strategy to upzone hundreds of thousands of lots to meet SF’s goal of only 36,200 additional projects by 2032.  And 80% of these projects must be affordable housing (see the primer linked above); however, inclusionary units and subsidies fall short of meeting this goal.

What’s next? On June 24 Mayor Lurie introduced legislation amending the Planning Code rules to incorporate the provisions of the Family Zoning Plan. It will be heard at the Board of Supervisors during the summer and likely voted on in early Fall.   

Upzoning: Impact on Dolores Heights 6/24/2025

Incentivizes significantly taller/longer buildings with negative impacts on open space and public views

Zoning  ElementDH SUD – the way it’s been since 1980Proposed Upzoning – the way it will be for multi-unit projects
Height35 feet height throughout the Dolores Heights Special Use District (DH SUD)40 feet – 65 feet heights – see SF Planning map for heights by street, plus up to 50’ on blocks east of Sanchez and north of 20th St.More changes – height, length, etc. below
Impact: taller buildings – 40 feet up to 65 feet, and 50 feet on some blocks – will cast more shadows on nearby homes, reduce public views, and degrade the view of Sanchez Hill.  See proposed map
Rear yard setback45% of lot depth  For a standard Dolores Heights lot (114’ deep), required rear yard: 51 feet Reduce current setback by 18% of lot depth: For a lot depth of 114 feet, required rear yard reduced to: 30.5 feet,
Impact: buildings can extend 20 feet further into the rear yard than the adjacent homes – reducing neighbors’ light, privacy, & the midblock open space in Dolores Heights.
Additional height allowedNoneCorner lots and lots > 8000 sq feet can add two stories, up to 65 feet height. 50 feet allowed on lots east of Sanchez and north of 20th.
Impact: Regardless of “base height”, properties on a corner or on a 8000 sf lot anywhere in Dolores Heights can build to 65 feet height – casting shadows and blocking public views up & down Sanchez Hill   
Project reviewHearings for variances and some demolitions“Ministerial” review: in many cases, no appeal rights or hearing if project meets standards
Impact: New buildings can be approved with no notice to neighbors or hearing to assess impact on neighbors or the neighborhood.  

What can we do?  DHIC is part of Neighborhoods United SF (NUSF.net ) which opposes the plan and advocates for alternative strategiesYou can write or call the Mayor to express your views on the plan. 

When Will SF End Unsheltered Homelessness?

On March 21, the Board of Supervisors reviewed “A Place for All” Implementation Plan prepared by the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing with a price tag of $1.4 billion.  The supervisors grilled the HSH representatives on the exorbitant cost of their proposed plan.  And other speakers pointed out that RescueSF, a grassroots resident and small business group, proposed an alternative that cost $1 billion less than the HSH plan.

Legislation adopted last year created a City Shelter Policy.  San Francisco has nearly 4400 persons living unsheltered on our streets.  The deaths, addiction, and other serious health conditions among them continue to grow.  The costs of street sleeping (in human lives and needed services) overwhelm our City’s capacity.  When will our City elected officials fund & provision enough shelter – as required by law?  For more information and to make your voice heard, visit RescueSF – Advocacy.